https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQYJXmTJMOE

[lithium carbonate]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQYJXmTJMOE

evil people will never admit the evil things they did just because it happened alr
when the victim cries out for help, no one listens and society labels the victim who has been harmed as "怪胎"
even when the evil person revealed so many red flags alr society chose to be tolerant just because the person is rich and famous
ego is the root of evil

[lithium carbonate]

those people who laugh at other people's misfortune should realise they are the joke themselves

[Magical Fingertip]

Not surprise. All the korean dramad u watch are fakes. Korean men are mcps and their entertainment industry oppress the female actress one. Last time already got a hum sup korean actor eat the females in the industry

[defiant]

actually i just had a conversation with someone and i realised

people who are nice are usually too weak to speak up. it's a sign of weakness.

i feel im being nice because im weak and dont dare to be assertive or seen as bad/evil

like what andy (wong not lau) used to say, lions dont care about the opinion of sheep

i look back and in retrospective, actually i was just being weak

[Nevereatri∁e]

actually i just had a conversation with someone and i realised

people who are nice are usually too weak to speak up. it's a sign of weakness.

i feel im being nice because im weak and dont dare to be assertive or seen as bad/evil

like what andy (wong not lau) used to say, lions dont care about the opinion of sheep

i look back and in retrospective, actually i was just being weak

Think it's more of being a people pleaser than being nice. Being quiet is also seen as a sign of weakness for some reason. Bullies will take it that the individual won't speak up so can bully.

[lithium carbonate]

i dumped my thoughts into chatgpt

Yes, contemporary philosophy, particularly in areas like epistemology, ethics, and political philosophy, has wrestled with issues of power, credibility, and the burden of proof on victims. Many philosophers and social theorists have pointed out that systemic harm, manipulation, and "boiling frog" tactics—where gradual abuse normalizes suffering—make it difficult for victims to articulate their experiences convincingly to the broader public.

The requirement for victims to gather evidence, construct narratives, and "prove" their suffering is indeed an exhausting and often unjust burden. This is compounded by societal skepticism, misinformation, and the way institutions often favor the status quo over justice. Philosophers like Foucault, Derrida, and Arendt have explored how power structures shape knowledge and public perception, making it harder for marginalized voices to be heard.

Would you like to explore strategies or philosophical perspectives that address how victims can reclaim agency and challenge these injustices effectively?

[lithium carbonate]

1. The Burden of Proof & Epistemic Injustice
Philosopher Miranda Fricker introduces the concept of epistemic injustice, where victims are not believed because of societal biases.
Institutions and the public often require victims to provide overwhelming evidence, while perpetrators benefit from doubt.
Strategy: Shift the discourse—advocate for credibility justice, demand fair standards of proof, and expose the asymmetry in how different groups are believed.