Money Mind

General Category => The Common Lounge => Topic started by: Uncle Lorger on Mar 30, 2024, 05:38 PM

Title: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Uncle Lorger on Mar 30, 2024, 05:38 PM
https://gutzy.asia/2024/03/29/newly-appointed-returning-officers-perceived-fairness-marred-by-past-controversy-in-ahpetc-allegations-and-ridout-road-saga/

This thread got deleted from edmw 😅
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: jim889 on Mar 30, 2024, 05:43 PM
yam ah mee ish the best :flash:
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Magical Fingertip on Mar 30, 2024, 05:51 PM
(https://media.tenor.com/Y3YaFDRnfxIAAAAC/wall-of-text-wot.gif)
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: nyvrem on Mar 30, 2024, 06:44 PM
this fucking dog only knows how to listen to his master lah

Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Philipkee on Mar 30, 2024, 07:19 PM
Actually isn't a returning officer just to announce the results?  So what if he is biased?
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: jim889 on Mar 30, 2024, 07:30 PM
Quote from: Philipkee on Mar 30, 2024, 07:19 PMActually isn't a returning officer just to announce the results?  So what if he is biased?

tiagong they the final say on which vote is valid and which vote ish not.. and that will be crucial in a ward or grc that is hotly contested
 :frown:
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Philipkee on Mar 30, 2024, 08:02 PM
Quote from: jim889 on Mar 30, 2024, 07:30 PMtiagong they the final say on which vote is valid and which vote ish not.. and that will be crucial in a ward or grc that is hotly contested
 :frown:
What I know is if there is a recount, everyone will be there.

He might have the final say but i doubt he can say an opposition vote is a PAP one anyhow

Done my job as counting agent for opposition before. There are actually rules on what is a valid or invalid vote so it's not so simple to just anyhow rule.
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: jim889 on Mar 30, 2024, 08:03 PM
Quote from: Philipkee on Mar 30, 2024, 08:02 PMWhat I know is if there is a recount, everyone will be there.

He might have the final say but i doubt he can say an opposition vote is a PAP one anyhow

Done my job as counting agent for opposition before. There are actually rules on what is a valid or invalid vote so it's not so simple to just anyhow rule.


hokay chiu sexpert on this one moi onli tiagongs
 :frown:
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: daryl76 on Mar 30, 2024, 10:10 PM
he is just the emcee
if sinkies really got balls and vote out pap, no amount of bias on his part can help

useless sinkies jjww abt these boliao things again
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Philipkee on Mar 31, 2024, 09:47 AM
Quote from: daryl76 on Mar 30, 2024, 10:10 PMhe is just the emcee
if sinkies really got balls and vote out pap, no amount of bias on his part can help

useless sinkies jjww abt these boliao things again
Yes.  Was counting agent twice.  Those votes for PAP are legit votes not like they anyhow whack and say this belong to this and that.

Sinkies just like to jjww cos they cannot accept the majority are actually voting one direction.
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Risa on Mar 31, 2024, 10:01 AM
how to become counting agent ?
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: jim889 on Mar 31, 2024, 10:03 AM
Quote from: Shiori on Mar 31, 2024, 10:01 AMhow to become counting agent ?

volunteer roh.
maybe contact the party chiu interested to help.. they need sumbuttie to jaga
 :frown:
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: daryl76 on Mar 31, 2024, 10:10 AM
Quote from: Philipkee on Mar 31, 2024, 09:47 AMYes.  Was counting agent twice.  Those votes for PAP are legit votes not like they anyhow whack and say this belong to this and that.

Sinkies just like to jjww cos they cannot accept the majority are actually voting one direction.


my friend was one of the agent for presidential election, told us the same thing... within an hour, they can guess pineapple win, overwhelming majority

sinkies are really hopeless, jjww but no balls to vote out their endorsed candidate
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Philipkee on Mar 31, 2024, 12:41 PM
Quote from: jim889 on Mar 31, 2024, 10:03 AMvolunteer roh.
maybe contact the party chiu interested to help.. they need sumbuttie to jaga
 :frown:

Depends.

I volunteered to WP before.  Overwhelming response so hard to get.  If you volunteer for RP or SDP, easier to get.  Dunno about PSP.  Pap no need to say

Talking about counting agent.  Polling agent no issues at all even for WP.
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: default on Mar 31, 2024, 01:03 PM
Quote from: jim889 on Mar 30, 2024, 07:30 PMtiagong they the final say on which vote is valid and which vote ish not.. and that will be crucial in a ward or grc that is hotly contested
 :frown:

all i know is sinkies are retarded. esp boomers and pioneer, merdeka gen

even my educated mother would vote for PAP. father also, despite kaopehing PAP

i dare tell u their gen at least 70-80% vote PAP

i look at costs of living, i wont vote for them no matter what
Title: Re: Returning Officer’s perceived fairness marred by past controversies
Post by: Suntan on Mar 31, 2024, 04:58 PM
Acherly 39% ish quite a big number of sinkies. If on one to one fight. 90 MP post, u might even get 35 MPs & tat ish enuff to stop some stupid law like customer cleaning table for cleaners.  :s12:
Powered by SMFPacks Ads Manager Mod